↓ Skip to main content

山下欣一著, 『南島説話生成の研究 : ユタ・英雄・祭儀』, 東京, 第一書房, 1998 年, 594 頁 +8 頁(索引), 8000 円

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ethnology, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
山下欣一著, 『南島説話生成の研究 : ユタ・英雄・祭儀』, 東京, 第一書房, 1998 年, 594 頁 +8 頁(索引), 8000 円
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ethnology, June 2002
DOI 10.14890/minkennewseries.67.1_119
Authors

小池 淳一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#19,928,641
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#156
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,409
of 126,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.