↓ Skip to main content

The Burden of Common Infectious Disease Syndromes at the Clinic and Household Level from Population-Based Surveillance in Rural and Urban Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Burden of Common Infectious Disease Syndromes at the Clinic and Household Level from Population-Based Surveillance in Rural and Urban Kenya
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel R. Feikin, Beatrice Olack, Godfrey M. Bigogo, Allan Audi, Leonard Cosmas, Barrack Aura, Heather Burke, M. Kariuki Njenga, John Williamson, Robert F. Breiman

Abstract

Characterizing infectious disease burden in Africa is important for prioritizing and targeting limited resources for curative and preventive services and monitoring the impact of interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 255 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 23%
Researcher 45 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 45 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 15%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Other 56 22%
Unknown 53 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,426,298
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#78,922
of 198,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,138
of 184,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#538
of 1,237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.