You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for the diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis in Uganda: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-133 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Moorine Penninah Sekadde, Eric Wobudeya, Moses L Joloba, Willy Ssengooba, Harriet Kisembo, Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka, Philippa Musoke |
Abstract |
The diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis remains a challenge worldwide. The Xpert MTB/RIF test, a rapid mycobacteria tuberculosis diagnostic tool, was recommended for use in children based on data from adult studies. We evaluated the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for the diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis using one induced sputum sample and described clinical characteristics associated with a positive Xpert MTB/RIF test. The sputum culture on both Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) was the gold standard. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 149 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
Researcher | 20 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Other | 28 | 18% |
Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 45% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,687,704
of 24,933,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#829
of 8,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,413
of 200,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#12
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,933,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.