The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors, abatacept, IL6-inhibitors and JAK-inhibitors in 31 846 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 19 registers from the ‘JAK-pot’ collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222586 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim Lauper, Michele Iudici, Denis Mongin, Sytske Anne Bergstra, Denis Choquette, Catalin Codreanu, René Cordtz, Diederik De Cock, Lene Dreyer, Ori Elkayam, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge, Doreen Huschek, Kimme L Hyrich, Florenzo Iannone, Nevsun Inanc, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, Eirik Klami Kristianslund, Tore K Kvien, Burkhard F Leeb, Galina Lukina, Dan C Nordström, Karel Pavelka, Manuel Pombo-Suarez, Ziga Rotar, Maria Jose Santos, Anja Strangfeld, Patrick Verschueren, Delphine Sophie Courvoisier, Axel Finckh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 44 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 19% |
| Scientists | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 284. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#131,114
of 26,372,008 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#45
of 7,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,047
of 449,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.