You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors, abatacept, IL6-inhibitors and JAK-inhibitors in 31 846 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 19 registers from the ‘JAK-pot’ collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222586 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim Lauper, Michele Iudici, Denis Mongin, Sytske Anne Bergstra, Denis Choquette, Catalin Codreanu, René Cordtz, Diederik De Cock, Lene Dreyer, Ori Elkayam, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge, Doreen Huschek, Kimme L Hyrich, Florenzo Iannone, Nevsun Inanc, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, Eirik Klami Kristianslund, Tore K Kvien, Burkhard F Leeb, Galina Lukina, Dan C Nordström, Karel Pavelka, Manuel Pombo-Suarez, Ziga Rotar, Maria Jose Santos, Anja Strangfeld, Patrick Verschueren, Delphine Sophie Courvoisier, Axel Finckh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 20% |
| Scientists | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 42% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 286. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#119,141
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#44
of 7,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,744
of 433,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.