You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
「発話困難な重度身体障がい者」の論文執筆過程の実態 ――思考主体の切り分け難さと能力の普遍性をめぐる考察――
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.4057/jsr.71.447 |
| Authors |
天畠 大輔 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,937,919
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#53
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,079
of 521,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.