You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consistency of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity estimates with respect to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-13-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anas Dogui, Nadjia Kachenoura, Frédérique Frouin, Muriel Lefort, Alain De Cesare, Elie Mousseaux, Alain Herment |
| Abstract |
Arterial stiffness is considered as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality, and is increasingly used in clinical practice. This study aimed at evaluating the consistency of the automated estimation of regional and local aortic stiffness indices from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 41% |
| Engineering | 22 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,436,572
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#678
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,789
of 196,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.