↓ Skip to main content

Genetic analysis of CHCHD2 in a southern Spanish population

Overview of attention for article published in Neurobiology of Aging, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic analysis of CHCHD2 in a southern Spanish population
Published in
Neurobiology of Aging, October 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.10.019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Tejera-Parrado, Silvia Jesús, Ismael Huertas-Fernández, Inmaculada Bernal-Bernal, Marta Bonilla-Toribio, Isabel Córdoba-Tevar, Irene Abreu-Rodríguez, Fátima Carrillo, Maravilla Bernal-Escudero, Laura Vargas-González, Manuel Carballo, Pilar Gómez-Garre, Pablo Mir

Abstract

Researching genetic factors involved in Parkinson's disease (PD) is crucial to increase our knowledge about the pathophysiology of the disorder. A missense mutation has recently been reported within CHCHD2, a gene newly associated with autosomal dominant PD. Subsequent studies in different ethnic populations have not reached any conclusive result about the role of CHCHD2 in PD. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the implication of this gene for a PD population from southern Spain (including 536 PD patients and 518 unrelated control subjects). We studied all 4 exons of CHCHD2 and their exon-intron boundary regions. Four variants were observed in non-coding regions. No significant differences were observed in the allele frequencies of these variants between patients and controls. Thus, our study suggests that CHCHD2 is probably not involved in the etiopathogenesis of PD in our population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,415,054
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#1,243
of 4,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,486
of 323,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#32
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.