You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adolescents’ self-efficacy and digital health literacy: a cross-sectional mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-13599-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melody Taba, Tiffany B. Allen, Patrina H.Y. Caldwell, S. Rachel Skinner, Melissa Kang, Kirsten McCaffery, Karen M. Scott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 43 | 58% |
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 47% |
| Scientists | 27 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 70 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 68 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#876,085
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#933
of 17,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,905
of 446,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#22
of 445 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 445 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.