↓ Skip to main content

A New Foundation for the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 497)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A New Foundation for the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness
Published in
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, March 2013
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axs037
Authors

C. H. Pence, G. Ramsey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 12 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 25%
Unspecified 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 5 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,132,308
of 11,657,610 outputs
Outputs from British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
#45
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,220
of 131,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,657,610 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.