↓ Skip to main content

Multimodal signaling in the Small Torrent Frog (Micrixalus saxicola) in a complex acoustic environment

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multimodal signaling in the Small Torrent Frog (Micrixalus saxicola) in a complex acoustic environment
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00265-013-1489-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doris Preininger, Markus Boeckle, Anita Freudmann, Iris Starnberger, Marc Sztatecsny, Walter Hödl

Abstract

Many animals use multimodal (both visual and acoustic) components in courtship signals. The acoustic communication of anuran amphibians can be masked by the presence of environmental background noise, and multimodal displays may enhance receiver detection in complex acoustic environments. In the present study, we measured sound pressure levels of concurrently calling males of the Small Torrent Frog (Micrixalus saxicola) and used acoustic playbacks and an inflatable balloon mimicking a vocal sac to investigate male responses to controlled unimodal (acoustic) and multimodal (acoustic and visual) dynamic stimuli in the frogs' natural habitat. Our results suggest that abiotic noise of the stream does not constrain signal detection, but males are faced with acoustic interference and masking from conspecific chorus noise. Multimodal stimuli elicited greater response from males and triggered significantly more visual signal responses than unimodal stimuli. We suggest that the vocal sac acts as a visual cue and improves detection and discrimination of acoustic signals by making them more salient to receivers amidst complex biotic background noise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 140 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 62%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,514,621
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#478
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,947
of 292,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.