↓ Skip to main content

Dinesha Samararatne, Review of Philipp Dann, Michael Riegner, and Maxim Bonnemann, eds., The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Constitutional Law, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dinesha Samararatne, Review of Philipp Dann, Michael Riegner, and Maxim Bonnemann, eds., The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law
Published in
International Journal of Constitutional Law, June 2022
DOI 10.1093/icon/moac031
Authors

Dinesha Samararatne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,813,375
of 21,738,040 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Constitutional Law
#175
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,688
of 310,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Constitutional Law
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,738,040 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.