You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Child protection training for professionals to improve reporting of child abuse and neglect
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011775.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kerryann Walsh, Elizabeth Eggins, Lorelei Hine, Ben Mathews, Maureen C Kenny, Sarah Howard, Natasha Ayling, Elizabeth Dallaston, Elizabeth Pink, Dimitrios Vagenas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 9 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
Spain | 4 | 9% |
Japan | 3 | 7% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
South Africa | 2 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 79% |
Scientists | 8 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Unspecified | 8 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 58 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
Unspecified | 8 | 7% |
Psychology | 7 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 58 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,534,207
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,351
of 13,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,729
of 427,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.