You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Functional Differences between Mitochondrial Haplogroup T and Haplogroup H in HEK293 Cybrid Cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0052367 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Edith E. Mueller, Susanne M. Brunner, Johannes A. Mayr, Olaf Stanger, Wolfgang Sperl, Barbara Kofler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Russia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,664,671
of 25,157,832 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,165
of 218,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,170
of 293,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,392
of 4,843 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,157,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,843 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.