You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Children’s Play and the Integration of Social and Individual Learning: A Cultural Niche Construction Perspective
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 13 |
Book title |
Social Learning and Innovation in Contemporary Hunter-Gatherers
|
Published in |
Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-4-431-55997-9_13 |
Book ISBNs |
978-4-43-155995-5, 978-4-43-155997-9
|
Authors |
Adam Howell Boyette, Boyette, Adam Howell |
Editors |
Hideaki Terashima, Barry S. Hewlett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 50% |
Researcher | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 6 | 50% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 17% |
Psychology | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,940,430
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,812
of 324,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them