↓ Skip to main content

The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemistry, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
patent
41 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
8203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5244 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets
Published in
Nature Chemistry, March 2013
DOI 10.1038/nchem.1589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manish Chhowalla, Hyeon Suk Shin, Goki Eda, Lain-Jong Li, Kian Ping Loh, Hua Zhang

Abstract

Ultrathin two-dimensional nanosheets of layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are fundamentally and technologically intriguing. In contrast to the graphene sheet, they are chemically versatile. Mono- or few-layered TMDs - obtained either through exfoliation of bulk materials or bottom-up syntheses - are direct-gap semiconductors whose bandgap energy, as well as carrier type (n- or p-type), varies between compounds depending on their composition, structure and dimensionality. In this Review, we describe how the tunable electronic structure of TMDs makes them attractive for a variety of applications. They have been investigated as chemically active electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution and hydrosulfurization, as well as electrically active materials in opto-electronics. Their morphologies and properties are also useful for energy storage applications such as electrodes for Li-ion batteries and supercapacitors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 39 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Korea, Republic of 7 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
India 6 <1%
China 5 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Other 18 <1%
Unknown 5143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1541 29%
Student > Master 628 12%
Researcher 621 12%
Student > Bachelor 378 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 261 5%
Other 609 12%
Unknown 1206 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1119 21%
Physics and Astronomy 949 18%
Chemistry 808 15%
Engineering 545 10%
Chemical Engineering 113 2%
Other 256 5%
Unknown 1454 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,573,202
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemistry
#1,291
of 3,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,126
of 214,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemistry
#13
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.