↓ Skip to main content

I Should but I Won’t: Why Young Children Endorse Norms of Fair Sharing but Do Not Follow Them

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
350 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
I Should but I Won’t: Why Young Children Endorse Norms of Fair Sharing but Do Not Follow Them
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig E. Smith, Peter R. Blake, Paul L. Harris

Abstract

Young children endorse fairness norms related to sharing, but often act in contradiction to those norms when given a chance to share. This phenomenon has rarely been explored in the context of a single study. Using a novel approach, the research presented here offers clear evidence of this discrepancy and goes on to examine possible explanations for its diminution with age. In Study 1, 3-8-year-old children readily stated that they themselves should share equally, asserted that others should as well, and predicted that others had shared equally with them. Nevertheless, children failed to engage in equal sharing until ages 7-8. In Study 2, 7-8-year-olds correctly predicted that they would share equally, and 3-6-year-olds correctly predicted that they would favor themselves, ruling out a failure-of-willpower explanation for younger children's behavior. Similarly, a test of inhibitory control in Study 1 also failed to explain the shift with age toward adherence to the endorsed norm. The data suggest that, although 3-year-olds know the norm of equal sharing, the weight that children attach to this norm increases with age when sharing involves a cost to the self.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 321 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 20%
Student > Bachelor 60 18%
Student > Master 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 8%
Researcher 24 7%
Other 66 20%
Unknown 49 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 186 56%
Social Sciences 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 61 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2022.
All research outputs
#321,168
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,544
of 225,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,079
of 211,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#98
of 5,447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.