You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A qualitative study of the barriers to prehospital management of acute pain in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emergency Medicine Journal, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/emermed-2012-202166 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Murphy, Michael Barrett, John Cronin, Siobhan McCoy, Philip Larkin, Maria Brenner, Abel Wakai, Ronan O'Sullivan |
| Abstract |
Effective pain management in the prehospital setting is gaining momentum as a potential key performance indicator by many emergency medical service systems, but historically has been shown to be inadequate, particularly in the paediatric population. This study aimed to identify the barriers, as perceived by a national cohort of advanced paramedics (APs), to achieving optimal prehospital management of acute pain in children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| Ireland | 4 | 12% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 30% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 53 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,273,352
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Journal
#354
of 4,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,488
of 210,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Journal
#11
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.