↓ Skip to main content

Attachment representations and autonomic regulation in maltreating and nonmaltreating mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Development & Psychopathology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attachment representations and autonomic regulation in maltreating and nonmaltreating mothers
Published in
Development & Psychopathology, October 2016
DOI 10.1017/s0954579416001036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Reijman, Lenneke R. A. Alink, Laura H. C. G. Compier-De Block, Claudia D. Werner, Athanasios Maras, Corine Rijnberk, Marinus H. Van Ijzendoorn, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg

Abstract

This study assessed attachment representation and attachment-related autonomic regulation in a sample of 38 maltreating and 35 nonmaltreating mothers. Mothers' state of mind regarding attachment was measured using the Adult Attachment Interview. They further watched an attachment-based comfort paradigm, during which we measured skin conductance and vagal tone. More maltreating mothers (42%) than nonmaltreating mothers (17%) had an unresolved/disoriented attachment classification. Attachment representation was related to physiology during the comfort paradigm: an unresolved state of mind and a nonautonomous classification were associated with a decrease in skin conductance during the comfort paradigm, specifically during the responsive caregiver scenario. However, physiology did not differ between maltreating and nonmaltreating mothers. The decrease in skin conductance of unresolved mothers during the comfort paradigm might be indicative of a deactivating response, which is congruent with the dissociative nature of the unresolved state of mind. The results point to the potential utility of interventions focused on attachment representations for maltreating mothers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 39%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 38%