↓ Skip to main content

LUMINEX®: a new technology for the simultaneous identification of five Entamoeba spp. commonly found in human stools

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LUMINEX®: a new technology for the simultaneous identification of five Entamoeba spp. commonly found in human stools
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-69
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena Lúcia Carneiro Santos, Kakali Bandyopadhyay, Rebecca Bandea, Regina Helena Saramago Peralta, José Mauro Peralta, Alexandre Januário Da Silva

Abstract

Six species of the genus Entamoeba, i.e., E. histolytica, E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, E. polecki, E. coli, and E. hartmanii can be found in human stools. Among these, only E. histolytica is considered to be pathogenic, causing intestinal and extra-intestinal disease, but it is morphologically identical to E. dispar and E. moshkovskii. In general, E. polecki, E. coli, and E. hartmanii can be differentiated morphologically from E. histolytica, but some of their diagnostic morphologic features may overlap creating issues for the differential diagnosis. Moreover, the previous inability to differentiate among Entamoeba species has limited epidemiologic information on E histolytica. The objective of this study was to develop a rapid, high-throughput screening method using Luminex technique for the simultaneous detection and differentiation of Entamoeba species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 52 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2013.
All research outputs
#5,849,361
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,217
of 5,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,447
of 196,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.