You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prediagnostic Plasma Vitamin D Metabolites and Mortality among Patients with Prostate Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018625 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fang Fang, Julie L. Kasperzyk, Irene Shui, Whitney Hendrickson, Bruce W. Hollis, Katja Fall, Jing Ma, J. Michael Gaziano, Meir J. Stampfer, Lorelei A. Mucci, Edward Giovannucci |
Abstract |
Laboratory evidence suggests that vitamin D might influence prostate cancer prognosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 18% |
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 22% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 47% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2016.
All research outputs
#18,332,122
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,062
of 193,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,390
of 108,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,242
of 1,441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.