↓ Skip to main content

Viral vectors for cystic fibrosis gene therapy: What does the future hold?

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Adaptation and Treatment, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Viral vectors for cystic fibrosis gene therapy: What does the future hold?
Published in
Virus Adaptation and Treatment, December 2010
DOI 10.2147/vaat.s8887
Authors

Uta Griesenbach, Makoto Inoue, Mamoru Hasegawa, Eric Alton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
India 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Psychology 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,987,199
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Virus Adaptation and Treatment
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,309
of 193,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Adaptation and Treatment
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them