You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cytoarchitectonical analysis and probabilistic mapping of two extrastriate areas of the human posterior fusiform gyrus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Structure and Function, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00429-012-0411-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian Caspers, Karl Zilles, Simon B. Eickhoff, Axel Schleicher, Hartmut Mohlberg, Katrin Amunts |
| Abstract |
The human extrastriate visual cortex comprises numerous functionally defined areas, which are not identified in the widely used cytoarchitectonical map of Brodmann. The ventral part of the extrastriate cortex is particularly devoted to the identification of visual objects, faces and word forms. We analyzed the region immediately antero-lateral to hOc4v in serially sectioned (20 μm) and cell body-stained human brains using a quantitative observer-independent cytoarchitectonical approach to further identify the anatomical organization of the extrastriate cortex. Two novel cytoarchitectonical areas, FG1 and FG2, were identified on the posterior fusiform gyrus. The results of ten postmortem brains were then registered to their MRI volumes (acquired before histological processing), 3D reconstructed, and spatially normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute reference brain. Finally, probabilistic maps were generated for each cytoarchitectonical area by superimposing the areas of the individual brains in the reference space. Comparison with recent functional imaging studies yielded that both areas are located within the object-related visual cortex. FG1 fills the gap between the retinotopically mapped area VO-1 and a posterior fusiform face patch. FG2 is probably the correlate of this face patch. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Researcher | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Professor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 30 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#1,015
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,460
of 165,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.