↓ Skip to main content

Saliva as a potential tool for cystic fibrosis diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saliva as a potential tool for cystic fibrosis diagnosis
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-8-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Cristina Gonçalves, Fernando Augusto de Lima Marson, Regina Maria de Holanda Mendonça, José Dirceu Ribeiro, Antonio Fernando Ribeiro, Ilma Aparecida Paschoal, Carlos Emílio Levy

Abstract

Saliva and sweat are modified by cystic fibrosis (CF). In both cases the chloride and sodium ion concentrations for healthy subjects and CF patients differ, this representing a possible alternative tool for CF diagnosis. In this context, the aim of this study was to compare the concentrations of these ions in saliva samples taken from CF patients and healthy subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Engineering 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Chemistry 6 7%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2013.
All research outputs
#14,747,687
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#487
of 1,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,648
of 197,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.