↓ Skip to main content

Step Detection in Single-Molecule Real Time Trajectories Embedded in Correlated Noise

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Step Detection in Single-Molecule Real Time Trajectories Embedded in Correlated Noise
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srikesh G. Arunajadai, Wei Cheng

Abstract

Single-molecule real time trajectories are embedded in high noise. To extract kinetic or dynamic information of the molecules from these trajectories often requires idealization of the data in steps and dwells. One major premise behind the existing single-molecule data analysis algorithms is the gaussian 'white' noise, which displays no correlation in time and whose amplitude is independent on data sampling frequency. This so-called 'white' noise is widely assumed but its validity has not been critically evaluated. We show that correlated noise exists in single-molecule real time trajectories collected from optical tweezers. The assumption of white noise during analysis of these data can lead to serious over- or underestimation of the number of steps depending on the algorithms employed. We present a statistical method that quantitatively evaluates the structure of the underlying noise, takes the noise structure into account, and identifies steps and dwells in a single-molecule trajectory. Unlike existing data analysis algorithms, this method uses Generalized Least Squares (GLS) to detect steps and dwells. Under the GLS framework, the optimal number of steps is chosen using model selection criteria such as Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Comparison with existing step detection algorithms showed that this GLS method can detect step locations with highest accuracy in the presence of correlated noise. Because this method is automated, and directly works with high bandwidth data without pre-filtering or assumption of gaussian noise, it may be broadly useful for analysis of single-molecule real time trajectories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 46%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 32%
Physics and Astronomy 14 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Engineering 4 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#17,682,134
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,503
of 193,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,415
of 197,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,695
of 5,434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.