↓ Skip to main content

CNV Analysis in Tourette Syndrome Implicates Large Genomic Rearrangements in COL8A1 and NRXN1

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CNV Analysis in Tourette Syndrome Implicates Large Genomic Rearrangements in COL8A1 and NRXN1
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abhishek Nag, Elena G. Bochukova, Barbara Kremeyer, Desmond D. Campbell, Heike Muller, Ana V. Valencia-Duarte, Julio Cardona, Isabel C. Rivas, Sandra C. Mesa, Mauricio Cuartas, Jharley Garcia, Gabriel Bedoya, William Cornejo, Luis D. Herrera, Roxana Romero, Eduardo Fournier, Victor I. Reus, Thomas L. Lowe, I. Sadaf Farooqi, the Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics, Carol A. Mathews, Lauren M. McGrath, Dongmei Yu, Ed Cook, Kai Wang, Jeremiah M. Scharf, David L. Pauls, Nelson B. Freimer, Vincent Plagnol, Andrés Ruiz-Linares

Abstract

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neuropsychiatric disorder with a strong genetic component. However, the genetic architecture of TS remains uncertain. Copy number variation (CNV) has been shown to contribute to the genetic make-up of several neurodevelopmental conditions, including schizophrenia and autism. Here we describe CNV calls using SNP chip genotype data from an initial sample of 210 TS cases and 285 controls ascertained in two Latin American populations. After extensive quality control, we found that cases (N = 179) have a significant excess (P = 0.006) of large CNV (>500 kb) calls compared to controls (N = 234). Amongst 24 large CNVs seen only in the cases, we observed four duplications of the COL8A1 gene region. We also found two cases with ∼400 kb deletions involving NRXN1, a gene previously implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders, including TS. Follow-up using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (and including 53 more TS cases) validated the CNV calls and identified additional patients with rearrangements in COL8A1 and NRXN1, but none in controls. Examination of available parents indicates that two out of three NRXN1 deletions detected in the TS cases are de-novo mutations. Our results are consistent with the proposal that rare CNVs play a role in TS aetiology and suggest a possible role for rearrangements in the COL8A1 and NRXN1 gene regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 112 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor 6 5%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Psychology 9 8%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,148,117
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#103,726
of 193,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,589
of 197,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,611
of 5,434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.