↓ Skip to main content

Zika virus infection damages the testes in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zika virus infection damages the testes in mice
Published in
Nature, October 2016
DOI 10.1038/nature20556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Govero, Prabagaran Esakky, Suzanne M. Scheaffer, Estefania Fernandez, Andrea Drury, Derek J. Platt, Matthew J. Gorman, Justin M. Richner, Elizabeth A. Caine, Vanessa Salazar, Kelle H. Moley, Michael S. Diamond

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection of pregnant women can cause congenital malformations including microcephaly, which has focused global attention on this emerging pathogen(1). In addition to transmission by mosquitoes, ZIKV can be detected in the seminal fluid of affected males for extended periods of time and transmitted sexually(2). Here, using a mouse-adapted African ZIKV strain (Dakar 41519), we evaluated the consequences of infection in the male reproductive tract of mice. We observed persistence of ZIKV, but not the closely related Dengue virus (DENV), in the testis and epididymis of male mice, and this was associated with tissue injury that caused diminished testosterone and inhibin B levels, and oligospermia. ZIKV preferentially infected spermatogonia, primary spermatocytes, and Sertoli cells in the testis, resulting in cell death and destruction of the seminiferous tubules. Less damage was observed with a contemporary Asian ZIKV strain (H/PF/2013), in part because this virus replicates less efficiently in mice. The extent to which these observations in mice translate to humans remains unclear, but longitudinal studies of sperm function and viability in ZIKV-infected humans seem warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 392 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 78 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 16%
Student > Master 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 73 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 55 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 2%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 87 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#11,915
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,188
of 98,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174
of 319,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#16
of 1,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.