↓ Skip to main content

Neural Correlates of Enhanced Visual Short-Term Memory for Angry Faces: An fMRI Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Correlates of Enhanced Visual Short-Term Memory for Angry Faces: An fMRI Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003536
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret C. Jackson, Claudia Wolf, Stephen J. Johnston, Jane E. Raymond, David E. J. Linden

Abstract

Fluid and effective social communication requires that both face identity and emotional expression information are encoded and maintained in visual short-term memory (VSTM) to enable a coherent, ongoing picture of the world and its players. This appears to be of particular evolutionary importance when confronted with potentially threatening displays of emotion - previous research has shown better VSTM for angry versus happy or neutral face identities. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, here we investigated the neural correlates of this angry face benefit in VSTM. Participants were shown between one and four to-be-remembered angry, happy, or neutral faces, and after a short retention delay they stated whether a single probe face had been present or not in the previous display. All faces in any one display expressed the same emotion, and the task required memory for face identity. We find enhanced VSTM for angry face identities and describe the right hemisphere brain network underpinning this effect, which involves the globus pallidus, superior temporal sulcus, and frontal lobe. Increased activity in the globus pallidus was significantly correlated with the angry benefit in VSTM. Areas modulated by emotion were distinct from those modulated by memory load. Our results provide evidence for a key role of the basal ganglia as an interface between emotion and cognition, supported by a frontal, temporal, and occipital network.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 4%
Canada 3 2%
France 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 109 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 33 27%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#18,333,600
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,062
of 193,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,236
of 91,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#349
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.