You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of In Vitro Cross-Reactivity to Avian H5N1 and Pandemic H1N1 2009 Influenza Following Prime Boost Regimens of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Healthy Human Subjects: A Randomised Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0059674 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delia Bethell, David Saunders, Anan Jongkaewwattana, Jarin Kramyu, Arunee Thitithayanont, Suwimon Wiboon-ut, Kosol Yongvanitchit, Amporn Limsalakpetch, Utaiwan Kum-Arb, Nichapat Uthaimongkol, Jean Michel Garcia, Ans E. Timmermans, Malik Peiris, Stephen Thomas, Anneke Engering, Richard G. Jarman, Duangrat Mongkolsirichaikul, Carl Mason, Nuanpan Khemnu, Stuart D. Tyner, Mark M. Fukuda, Douglas S. Walsh, Sathit Pichyangkul |
| Abstract |
Recent studies have demonstrated that inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines (IIV) may elicit production of heterosubtypic antibodies, which can neutralize avian H5N1 virus in a small proportion of subjects. We hypothesized that prime boost regimens of live and inactivated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines (LAIV and IIV) would enhance production of heterosubtypic immunity and provide evidence of cross-protection against other influenza viruses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#18,306,920
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,153
of 201,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,459
of 199,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,648
of 5,342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.