You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nasal and perirectal colonization of vancomycin sensitive and resistant enterococci in patients of paediatrics ICU (PICU) of tertiary health care facilities
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-156 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Muhammad Arfat Yameen, Saira Iram, Abdul Mannan, Shujaat Ali Khan, Naeem Akhtar |
Abstract |
Enterococci normally inhabit the intestinal tract of humans and are also a potential pathogen in causing nosocomial infections. The increase in antibiotic resistance and transfer of antibiotic resistance gene to Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) due to co-colonization has increased its importance in research. The aim of the study was to evaluate local epidemiology of nasal and rectal colonization with Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) in patients of Paediatrics Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and correlation with clinical and socioeconomic factors. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 76 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 19% |
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 25% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2013.
All research outputs
#17,683,485
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,071
of 7,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,697
of 197,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#89
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.