↓ Skip to main content

Open-Source 3D-Printable Optics Equipment

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Open-Source 3D-Printable Optics Equipment
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059840
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chenlong Zhang, Nicholas C. Anzalone, Rodrigo P. Faria, Joshua M. Pearce

Abstract

Just as the power of the open-source design paradigm has driven down the cost of software to the point that it is accessible to most people, the rise of open-source hardware is poised to drive down the cost of doing experimental science to expand access to everyone. To assist in this aim, this paper introduces a library of open-source 3-D-printable optics components. This library operates as a flexible, low-cost public-domain tool set for developing both research and teaching optics hardware. First, the use of parametric open-source designs using an open-source computer aided design package is described to customize the optics hardware for any application. Second, details are provided on the use of open-source 3-D printers (additive layer manufacturing) to fabricate the primary mechanical components, which are then combined to construct complex optics-related devices. Third, the use of the open-source electronics prototyping platform are illustrated as control for optical experimental apparatuses. This study demonstrates an open-source optical library, which significantly reduces the costs associated with much optical equipment, while also enabling relatively easily adapted customizable designs. The cost reductions in general are over 97%, with some components representing only 1% of the current commercial investment for optical products of similar function. The results of this study make its clear that this method of scientific hardware development enables a much broader audience to participate in optical experimentation both as research and teaching platforms than previous proprietary methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 240 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 23%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 29 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 66 26%
Physics and Astronomy 41 16%
Chemistry 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Computer Science 10 4%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 42 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#556,905
of 24,366,830 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,752
of 210,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,716
of 201,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#166
of 5,333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,366,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.