You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The influence of commercially-available carbohydrate and carbohydrate-protein supplements on endurance running performance in recreational athletes during a field trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-10-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriana Coletta, Dixie L Thompson, Hollie A Raynor |
| Abstract |
It is recommended that endurance athletes consume carbohydrate (CHO) supplements, providing 6-8% CHO concentration, during exercise > 60 minutes to improve athletic performance. Recently research has compared carbohydrate-protein (CHO-P) supplementation to the traditionally used CHO supplementation during endurance exercise, following these supplementation recommendations, in controlled settings, but not under simulated applied conditions such as a field trial. Therefore, the purpose of the present investigation was to test CHO and CHO-P supplementation under applied conditions such that commercially-available isocaloric (CHO-P & double-carbohydrate [CHO-CHO]) and isocarbohydrate (CHO-P & CHO) supplements were compared to a placebo (PLA), within an outdoor running field trial > 60 minutes in order to asses their influence on endurance performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2020.
All research outputs
#965,492
of 24,021,239 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#235
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,006
of 430,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#226
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,021,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.