You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Complementary and alternative exercise for fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s32297 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Scott David Mist, Kari A Firestone, Kim Dupree Jones |
Abstract |
Complementary and alternative medicine includes a number of exercise modalities, such as tai chi, qigong, yoga, and a variety of lesser-known movement therapies. A meta-analysis of the current literature was conducted estimating the effect size of the different modalities, study quality and bias, and adverse events. The level of research has been moderately weak to date, but most studies report a medium-to-high effect size in pain reduction. Given the lack of adverse events, there is little risk in recommending these modalities as a critical component in a multimodal treatment plan, which is often required for fibromyalgia management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Italy | 1 | 9% |
Mexico | 1 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 191 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
Researcher | 24 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
Other | 42 | 21% |
Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 12% |
Psychology | 18 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 17 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 12% |
Unknown | 52 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#924,833
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#124
of 1,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,010
of 194,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.