Rodrigo M. Feitosa, Gabriela P. Camacho, Thiago S. R. Silva, Mônica A. Ulysséa, Natalia Ladino, Aline M. Oliveira, Emília Z. Albuquerque, Fernando A. Schmidt, Carla R. Ribas, Anselmo Nogueira, Fabrício B. Baccaro, Antônio C. M. Queiroz, Wesley Dáttilo, Rogério R. Silva, Jean C. Santos, Ananza M. Rabello, Maria Santina De C. Morini, Yves P. Quinet, Kleber Del-Claro, Ana Y. Harada, Karine S. Carvalho, Tathiana G. Sobrinho, Aline B. Moraes, André B. Vargas, Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi, Jorge Luiz P. Souza, Tatianne Marques, Thiago Izzo, Denise Lange, Iracenir A. Santos, Larissa Nahas, Lucas Paolucci, Stela A. Soares, Cinthia B. Costa-Milanez, Eduardo Diehl-Fleig, Renata B. F. Campos, Ricardo Solar, Tiago Frizzo, Wesley Darocha
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,147,709
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Systematics and Biodiversity
#23
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,623
of 441,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematics and Biodiversity
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.
