↓ Skip to main content

Patient journey in erosive oesophagitis: real-world perspectives from US physicians and patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Gastroenterology, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 389)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient journey in erosive oesophagitis: real-world perspectives from US physicians and patients
Published in
BMJ Open Gastroenterology, July 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-000941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael F Vaezi, Stephen Brunton, A Mark Fendrick, Colin W Howden, Christian Atkinson, Corey Pelletier, Rinu Jacob, Stuart J Spechler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#498,708
of 24,887,826 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Gastroenterology
#14
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,722
of 425,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Gastroenterology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,887,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.