You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reducing Neonatal Mortality in India: Critical Role of Access to Emergency Obstetric Care
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0057244 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anu Rammohan, Kazi Iqbal, Niyi Awofeso |
Abstract |
Neonatal mortality currently accounts for 41% of all global deaths among children below five years. Despite recording a 33% decline in neonatal deaths between 2000 and 2009, about 900,000 neonates died in India in 2009. The decline in neonatal mortality is slower than in the post-neonatal period, and neonatal mortality rates have increased as a proportion of under-five mortality rates. Neonatal mortality rates are higher among rural dwellers of India, who make up at least two-thirds of India's population. Identifying the factors influencing neonatal mortality will significantly improve child survival outcomes in India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 151 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 20% |
Researcher | 19 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
Other | 33 | 21% |
Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,485,659
of 25,048,615 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#145,905
of 217,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,340
of 202,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,130
of 5,340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,048,615 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.