↓ Skip to main content

Indigenous peoples activism on climate change in Southeast Asia: the role of regional scalar bridging organizations

Overview of attention for article published in The Pacific Review, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indigenous peoples activism on climate change in Southeast Asia: the role of regional scalar bridging organizations
Published in
The Pacific Review, July 2022
DOI 10.1080/09512748.2022.2096681
Authors

Kim D. Reimann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,220,620
of 22,408,829 outputs
Outputs from The Pacific Review
#217
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,853
of 341,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Pacific Review
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,408,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.