You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dynamic and Polarized Muscle Cell Behaviors Accompany Tail Morphogenesis in the Ascidian Ciona intestinalis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2007
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000714 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yale J. Passamaneck, Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis, Anna Di Gregorio |
Abstract |
Axial elongation is a key morphogenetic process that serves to shape developing organisms. Tail extension in the ascidian larva represents a striking example of this process, wherein paraxially positioned muscle cells undergo elongation and differentiation independent of the segmentation process that characterizes the formation of paraxial mesoderm in vertebrates. Investigating the cell behaviors underlying the morphogenesis of muscle in ascidians may therefore reveal the evolutionarily conserved mechanisms operating during this process. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 53% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,267,294
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,093
of 193,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,694
of 67,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#173
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.