You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-sterile gloves and dressing versus sterile gloves, dressings and drapes for suturing of traumatic wounds in the emergency department: a non-inferiority multicentre randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emergency Medicine Journal, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/emermed-2021-211540 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juliette J M Zwaans, Wouter Raven, Arthur V Rosendaal, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Geesje Van Woerden, Peter Patka, Juanita A Haagsma, Pleunie P M Rood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 283 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 65 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 6% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 167 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 238 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 33 | 12% |
| Scientists | 9 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 240. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#159,740
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Journal
#12
of 4,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,787
of 434,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Journal
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.