↓ Skip to main content

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: current perspectives on diagnostic pathology and genetics—Bowman Club Lecture

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: current perspectives on diagnostic pathology and genetics—Bowman Club Lecture
Published in
BMJ Open Ophthalmology, July 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001103
Authors

Caroline Thaung, Alice E Davidson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#12,380,894
of 22,156,439 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#101
of 292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,407
of 333,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,156,439 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.