You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing the effect of a lactation-specific relaxation and visualisation intervention versus standard care on lactation and mental health outcomes in mothers of very premature infants (the EXPRESS trial): study protocol for a multi-centre, unmasked, randomised, parallel-group trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-022-06570-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilana Levene, Jennifer L. Bell, Christina Cole, Kayleigh Stanbury, Frances O’Brien, Mary Fewtrell, Maria A. Quigley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 58% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,944,006
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,114
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,987
of 436,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them