You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer‐related mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013829.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asha Bonney, Reem Malouf, Corynne Marchal, David Manners, Kwun M Fong, Henry M Marshall, Louis B Irving, Renée Manser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 76% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 100 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 108 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#713,167
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,324
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,157
of 433,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.