↓ Skip to main content

The Burden of Obesity on Diabetes in the United States: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2008 to 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Value in Health (Elsevier Science), November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Burden of Obesity on Diabetes in the United States: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2008 to 2012
Published in
Value in Health (Elsevier Science), November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.735
Pubmed ID
Authors

Man Yee Mallory Leung, Nils P. Carlsson, Graham A. Colditz, Su-Hsin Chang

Abstract

Diabetes is one of the most prevalent and costly chronic diseases in the United States. To analyze the risk of developing diabetes and the annual cost of diabetes for a US general population. Data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2008 to 2012, were used to analyze 1) probabilities of developing diabetes and 2) annual total health care expenditures for diabetics. The age-, sex-, race-, and body mass index (BMI)-specific risks of developing diabetes were estimated by fitting an exponential survival function to age at first diabetes diagnosis. Annual health care expenditures were estimated using a generalized linear model with log-link and gamma variance function. Complex sampling designs in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were adjusted for. All dollar values are presented in 2012 US dollars. We observed a more than 6 times increase in diabetes risks for class III obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2)) individuals compared with normal-weight individuals. Using age 50 years as an example, we found a more than 3 times increase in annual health care expenditures for those with diabetes ($13,581) compared with those without diabetes ($3,954). Compared with normal-weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m(2)) individuals, class II obese (35 ≤ BMI < 40 kg/m(2)) and class III obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m(2)) individuals incurred an annual marginal cost of $628 and $756, respectively. The annual health care expenditure differentials between those with and without diabetes of age 50 years were the highest for individuals with class II ($12,907) and class III ($9,703) obesity. This article highlights the importance of obesity on diabetes burden. Our results suggested that obesity, in particular, class II and class III (i.e., BMI ≥ 35 kg/m(2)) obesity, is associated with a substantial increase in the risk of developing diabetes and imposes a large economic burden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 32 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,256,805
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#336
of 4,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,353
of 317,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#12
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.