↓ Skip to main content

Examining the Extinction of the Barbary Lion and Its Implications for Felid Conservation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
156 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
23 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining the Extinction of the Barbary Lion and Its Implications for Felid Conservation
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon A. Black, Amina Fellous, Nobuyuki Yamaguchi, David L. Roberts

Abstract

Estimations of species extinction dates are rarely definitive, yet declarations of extinction or extirpation are important as they define when conservation efforts may cease. Erroneous declarations of extinctions not only destabilize conservation efforts but also corrode local community support. Mismatches in perceptions by the scientific and local communities risk undermining sensitive, but important partnerships. We examine observations relating to the decline and extinction of Barbary lions in North Africa. Whilst the extinction predates the era of the scientific conservation movement, the decline is relatively well documented in historical records. Recently unearthed accounts suggest Barbary lions survived later than previously assumed. We use probabilistic methods to estimate a more recent extinction date for the subspecies. The evidence presented for a much later persistence of lions in North Africa, including generations when sightings were nil, suggests caution when considering felid populations as extinct in the wild. The case raises the possibility that captive animals descended from the Moroccan royal collection are closer contemporaries to wild Barbary lions. Furthermore, our results highlight the vulnerability of very small lion populations and the significance of continued conservation of remnant lion populations in Central and West Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Brazil 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Researcher 14 18%
Other 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 41%
Environmental Science 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#321,839
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,559
of 225,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,108
of 214,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#98
of 5,306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.