↓ Skip to main content

Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
475 X users
facebook
64 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
12 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain
Published in
BMC Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zakir Khan, Christophe Combadière, François-Jérôme Authier, Valérie Itier, François Lux, Christopher Exley, Meriem Mahrouf-Yorgov, Xavier Decrouy, Philippe Moretto, Olivier Tillement, Romain K Gherardi, Josette Cadusseau

Abstract

Long-term biodistribution of nanomaterials used in medicine is largely unknown. This is the case for alum, the most widely used vaccine adjuvant, which is a nanocrystalline compound spontaneously forming micron/submicron-sized agglomerates. Although generally well tolerated, alum is occasionally detected within monocyte-lineage cells long after immunization in presumably susceptible individuals with systemic/neurologic manifestations or autoimmune (inflammatory) syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 475 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Other 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 387. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#80,963
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#87
of 4,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#457
of 213,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#2
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.