The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 246 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of salt substitutes on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heart, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuejun Yin, Anthony Rodgers, Adam Perkovic, Liping Huang, Ka-Chun Li, Jie Yu, Yangfeng Wu, J H Y Wu, Matti Marklund, Mark D Huffman, J Jaime Miranda, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Darwin Labarthe, Paul Elliott, Maoyi Tian, Bruce Neal |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 195 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 152 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 47 | 19% |
| Scientists | 40 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 26% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1082. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#14,997
of 26,322,284 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#14
of 6,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#540
of 438,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,322,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.