You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expert consensus statement on therapeutic drug monitoring and individualization of linezolid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.967311 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bin Lin, Yangmin Hu, Ping Xu, Tao Xu, Chunyan Chen, Le He, Mi Zhou, Zhangzhang Chen, Chunhong Zhang, Xuben Yu, Luo Fang, Junfeng Zhu, Yanlan Ji, Qun Lin, Hengbin Cao, Youqin Dai, Xiaoyan Lu, Changcheng Shi, Li Li, Changjiang Wang, Xumei Li, Qiongyan Fang, Jing Miao, Zhengyi Zhu, Guangyong Lin, Haichao Zhan, Shiwen Lv, Yalan Zhu, Xinjun Cai, Yin Ying, Meng Chen, Qiong Xu, Yiwen Zhang, Yubin Xu, Pea Federico, Saiping Jiang, Haibin Dai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 20% |
| Colombia | 3 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Panama | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,475,184
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#750
of 14,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,038
of 435,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#38
of 1,292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.