↓ Skip to main content

Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
48 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, Liane Young

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 288 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 19%
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Bachelor 43 14%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 51 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 155 50%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Philosophy 11 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 62 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#704,142
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,384
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,776
of 214,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#182
of 5,324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.