Title |
Pediatric emergency medicine point-of-care ultrasound: summary of the evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Ultrasound Journal, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13089-016-0049-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer R. Marin, Alyssa M. Abo, Alexander C. Arroyo, Stephanie J. Doniger, Jason W. Fischer, Rachel Rempell, Brandi Gary, James F. Holmes, David O. Kessler, Samuel H. F. Lam, Marla C. Levine, Jason A. Levy, Alice Murray, Lorraine Ng, Vicki E. Noble, Daniela Ramirez-Schrempp, David C. Riley, Turandot Saul, Vaishali Shah, Adam B. Sivitz, Ee Tein Tay, David Teng, Lindsey Chaudoin, James W. Tsung, Rebecca L. Vieira, Yaffa M. Vitberg, Resa E. Lewiss |
Abstract |
The utility of point-of-care ultrasound is well supported by the medical literature. Consequently, pediatric emergency medicine providers have embraced this technology in everyday practice. Recently, the American Academy of Pediatrics published a policy statement endorsing the use of point-of-care ultrasound by pediatric emergency medicine providers. To date, there is no standard guideline for the practice of point-of-care ultrasound for this specialty. This document serves as an initial step in the detailed "how to" and description of individual point-of-care ultrasound examinations. Pediatric emergency medicine providers should refer to this paper as reference for published research, objectives for learners, and standardized reporting guidelines. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 18 | 18% |
United States | 17 | 17% |
Canada | 8 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 8% |
Malaysia | 5 | 5% |
Chile | 3 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Costa Rica | 2 | 2% |
South Africa | 2 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 57 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 35% |
Scientists | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 264 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 47 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 11% |
Researcher | 23 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
Other | 61 | 23% |
Unknown | 69 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 51% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 7% |
Unknown | 85 | 32% |