The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Explainer: what are antibodies and why are viruses like dengue worse the second time?
|
---|---|
Published by |
The Conversation, November 2016
|
Authors |
Cameron Webb, Emily Johnston Flies |
Abstract |
Our immune system protects us but when it comes to some mosquito-borne disease, it can work against us. What are the implications for the development of a Zika virus vaccine? |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 10 | 10% |
United States | 8 | 8% |
Spain | 3 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Nigeria | 3 | 3% |
New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 61 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 73 | 72% |
Scientists | 13 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#238,880
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from The Conversation
#27,813
of 193,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,495
of 321,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Conversation
#568
of 4,500 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,500 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.