You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Synthetic Lethality between Gene Defects Affecting a Single Non-essential Molecular Pathway with Reversible Steps
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003016 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrei Zinovyev, Inna Kuperstein, Emmanuel Barillot, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 26% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 26% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,024
of 9,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,786
of 214,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#123
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.